Mitigation plan vs. acceleration plan in project planning: in-depth analysis for project control professionals

Introduction :

Whether you're piloting a €10m construction project or a €1bn infrastructure program, one reality remains: delays are inevitable. The real differentiating factor is not avoiding them altogether, but knowing how to anticipating risks and to effectively counteract drift when they occur.

This is where two essential project management strategies come into play: the mitigation plan and the acceleration plan.

Often confused or used interchangeably, these approaches have different objectives and are applied at different points in the project life cycle.

Let's take a closer look.

What is a mitigation plan?

A mitigation plan is a strategy proactive to reduce the probability or impact of risks before they materialize.

Key features :

  • Timing Planning phase or start of execution
  • Objective prevent or mitigate identified risks
  • Focus risk reduction/avoidance
  • Approach based on probabilistic analysis, feedback and weak signals

 

Case in point:

On a civil engineering project, a high risk of seasonal flooding can have an impact on earthworks.

👉 A mitigation plan could include:

  • Replan critical activities in dry periods
  • Introduce float or lags
  • Back-up equipment for rapid recovery

 

Modeling in Primavera P6 :

  • Using the risk management module
  • Linking risks to the activities concerned
  • Define mitigation actions
  • Simulate scenarios (e.g. Monte Carlo using external tools)
  • Integrate contingency margins (float)

 

What is an acceleration plan?

A acceleration plan is a strategy reactive, It is used when the project is behind schedule or when the customer demands early delivery.

Key features :

  • Timing : after a delay or at the customer's request
  • Objective : making up time or compressing the schedule
  • Focus : faster execution
  • Impact : often rising costs and pressure on resources

 

Case in point:

A mechanical installation lot is 3 weeks behind schedule.

👉 Possible acceleration plan :

  • Setting up double shifts or weekend work
  • Reallocation of resources to the critical path
  • Fast-tracking (overlapping tasks)
  • Crashing (increasing resources to reduce durations)

 

Modeling in Primavera P6 :

  • Analyze critical path after update
  • Reduce durations or modify logic (FS → SS, FF...)
  • Reprioritizing resources
  • Compare with baseline to measure catch-up
  • Assessing the cost/resource impact

 

Why this distinction is essential

In high-stakes environments (EPC, energy, infrastructure, defense), confusing mitigation with acceleration can lead to :

  • Misaligned expectations among stakeholders
  • Additional costs due to uncontrolled acceleration
  • Poor visibility of risks
  • Unanticipated contractual delays

 

✅ Best practices under Primavera P6

  • Integrating risk from the outset (Primavera Risk Analysis, Safran Risk)
  • Testing scenarios via copies or reflections
  • Maintain a clean, fixed baseline
  • Use filters and layouts to quickly identify drifts
  • Clear documentation strategies in planning reports

 

Conclusion

In modern project controls, performance is based on the ability to be anticipatory and reactive at the same time :

  • The mitigation plan reduces surprises
  • The acceleration plan allows you to get back on track

 

👉 The best professionals know when to use one, when to activate the other - and how to combine them intelligently.

 

What about you? Have you already implemented mitigation or acceleration strategies? How has Primavera P6 helped you in your decisions?

 
 

More questions?

Our latest articles

Before accelerating a schedule, ask yourself these 3 questions

Before accelerating a schedule, ask yourself these 3 questions

Before accelerating your next schedule, ask yourself these three questions. Introduction: Before accelerating your next schedule, ask yourself these three questions. They…